SCOTUS-Toons

This week on SCOTUS-Toons!
The cartoon SCOTUS is taking Monday off but will hear two oral arguments on Tuesday and one on Wednesday. Watch at https://www.youtube.com/DanielLeeMeeks

Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC (22-660): Under 18 U.S.C. § 1514A, must a whistleblower prove his employer acted with “retaliatory intent” as part of his case in chief?

Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co., LLC (22-500): Is a choice-of-law clause in a maritime contract unenforceable if enforcement would conflict with the “strong public policy” of the state whose law is displaced?

Alexander v. SC Conference of NAACP (22-807): Does the South Carolina legislature’s redistricting map, which has the effect of moving tens of thousands of Black voters to a different district, constitute an impermissible racial gerrymander, even if the legislators’ purported intent was merely a political gerrymander?

NEW VIDEOS TODAY!
11:00 AM EST: Bartenwerfer v. Buckley
youtu.be/KB73rGxxaOE

12:15 PM EST: U.S., ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health
youtu.be/yExH_DvTNEk

1:45 PM EST: MOAC Mall Holdings v. Transform Holdco
youtu.be/HP2MhnrR6gw

Delaware v. Pennsylvania and Wisconsin (Orig.145)
Arkansas v. Delaware (Orig.146)
Are unclaimed MoneyGram checks “money orders” or “similar written instruments” and thus subject to a federal law that remits them to the states where they were purchased?

Delaware v. Pennsylvania and Wisconsin | SCOTUS-Toons (2022-10-03) Delaware v. Pennsylvania and Wisconsin (Orig.145)Arkansas v. Delaware (Orig.146)Are unclaimed MoneyGram checks “money orders” or “similar written instruments...