Philadelphia Science Action

"Under the [final] rule, destroying an endangered species’ nest or habitat would no longer be considered illegal." Also, "Legal scholars said the government was acting without conducting scientific research into the impact of the change, a step that would typically precede a move of this kind." And, "After the rule was proposed last year, it triggered roughly 220,000 public comments. About 99% were against the change, according to an analysis by the New York Times that used artificial intelligence."

Trump strips key endangered species shield Trump strips key endangered species shield

Local Op-Ed in today's paper: "Scientific leadership may not always be seen as a measure of national strength, but it should be."

Persistence and funding will determine scientific progress Persistence and funding will determine scientific progress