Constitutionists

The firefighter is Mitchell "Mitch" Lundgaard of the Appleton Fire Department.

Mitch was shot and killed after saving the life of (murderer’s name will not be mentioned on this page) who had overdosed.

The murderer was out on reduced bail and had an extensive criminal history for violent felonies, felony narcotics charges and disorderly conduct.

In the video (see link below) at least one police officer, along with Mitch Lundgaard, are conversing with the murderer after having saved his life.

The officer states that they need to pat him down for weapons, and the murderer protests, saying he needs a moment to collect himself.

Officer: “You went unresponsive… (you went into) laborious, pre-death breathing. They gave you a little bit of Narcan, which treats opioid overdose. I’m not saying that guy did anything intentionally or illegal - what I’m going to do, bud - I’m going to pay you down, okay? You’re not in any trouble but I need to make sure that nothing is going to happen with them, ok?”

Murderer: “Wait - I can’t - I’ve got to check myself first…”

Officer: (laughing) - “Ok - you want to check your self first…? Ok…”

Officer: “ok- real quick - do you have any weapons on you?”

Murderer: “No, sir!”

Officer: “You have kind of a bulge on your right side..”

Murderer: “That’s my phone…”

Officer: “Ok, well don’t reach - just…”

Crosstalk

Murderer: “I have a problem with officers touching me, man.”

These acts of kindness proved deadly, as the murderer was only seeking to buy time to pull his firearm. He would have killed both of these men, and possibly more, but the murderer was shot and killed by police during the exchange of gunfire. Sadly, the murderer wasn’t neutralized before taking the life of the man who had just saved his.

The false narrative of endless Black victimization led to the hesitation on the part of the White police officer in dealing with a Black suspect. Ultimately, that hesitation in dealing with a criminal is what caused Mitch Lundgaard to lose his life.

Prayers for Mitch Lundgaard, his family, loved ones and his extended family in the emergency/first responder community.

Taya (@travelingflying) on X

My conversation with SuperGrock about political / media suppression of racial information unless the crime is White on Black…

Me. What is the race of the victims from this attack by a Black male?

G. Not publicly disclosed.
Major news reports (NYT, AP, BBC, CNN, etc.) describe the victims only by age and injuries (84-year-old man, 65-year-old man, 70-year-old woman) with no mention of race. No official statements or photos reveal it.

Me. Why are the complete descriptions of the victims being suppressed, and by whom?

G. Not suppressed. NYPD and major outlets (NYT, AP, BBC, CBS) release only ages, genders, and injuries per standard privacy policy for random attacks on private citizens. No names, photos, or races disclosed by officials or media. No evidence of deliberate withholding.

Me. The fact suppression is “standard practice” doesn’t mean the information is not being purposefully suppressed.

G. No evidence of purposeful suppression. All major outlets (NYT, AP, BBC, CNN, Fox, NY Post) uniformly report only ages/genders/injuries per NYPD briefing and standard policy for non-famous random-attack victims. No names, photos, or races released by officials or media. This matches routine practice across outlets, not selective omission.

Me. There is evidence of suppression. If a White male had slashed three Black people on a subway, going by history of media and law enforcement public performance, wouldn’t those facts not only be provided, but actually featured in the headlines?

G. Yes. Media and law enforcement history shows White-on-Black in*******al attacks routinely feature race in headlines and details (e.g., Central Park Five reversal framing, Arbery, Floyd-era cases), while Black-on-White cases match this incident’s age/gender-only reporting.

This dude with multiple priors including one for “menacing with a sharp object” just slashed 3 people at the NYC subway

Her name is Christine Jones. Christine is a 61 year old grandmother. Christine lived in Cottage Grove, WI, and worked as a hotel housekeeping supervisor.

On Sunday, March 22, 2026, Christine was shot in the back and killed. She was in a Madison parking ramp, walking into work at 7:56 in the morning.

The murderer, a 31 year-old Black female who will only be referred to as Scum in this post, is a convicted felon (prior resisting arrest, battery to officer). Scum was a former coworker at the same hotel (Scum was fired in April of 2025).

This cowardly Black female was arrested March 23/24 outside her Milwaukee St. apartment. Gun recovered; ballistics matched.

The murderer was charged with first-degree intentional homicide and firearm possession by felon.

A bond was set at $2M (bond set for a cold-blooded murder?); preliminary hearing was April 1. 

After she was fired, Scum slashed the tires on Christine Jones’ vehicle. Scum accused Christine Jones of “racism” - merely because Christine is a White woman and a supporter of Donald Trump. Scum had expressed prior ongoing animosity over her deluded claims of “racism.”

This was absolutely a targeted murder, fueled by a false political racial motive. 

No national media; no hate crime charge filed.

When confronted with this horrific radicalized murder, even seemingly-otherwise reasonable Black people respond with pathetic, mealy-mouthed obfuscation and deflection:

“Well, we don’t know if that’s what really happened. We need more information…”

Isn’t it amazing how the demand by Blacks for “more information” increases when the individual holding the knife or the gun is Black and the dead person is White?

In the murder of Iryna Zarutska, we watched 5 Black people witness the attack, and do nothing. Not even a word of sympathy for the victim as her lifeblood drained from her body.

In the murder of White teenager Austin Metcalf, we actually saw Black people support the murderer, raising around $750,000 for the killer and his family. Those Blacks didn’t need “more information” in that case. They heard a Black teen had murdered a White teen, and they flocked to the false narrative of “self-defense” even as the evidence disproving that narrative became overwhelming.

Every year, of all violent interactions between Blacks and Whites, the attacker is Black in 85-90% of all instances. Of all in*******al murder between Blacks and Whites, Blacks murder Whites at 2-6x the rate of White on Black.

These facts are true, even despite the fact that the Black population is 1/5th the size of the White population.

At what point does the conclusion become inescapable, that there is not only a highly toxic racial hatred of White people among Black people, but that it exists within a significant share - if not a majority - of the Black population in the USA? What is the solution? How does a peaceful civilized people live with deluded racists who are cool with racial murder, or at a minimum, refuse to call it out?