Advocate A. Prudhvi Raj

The Supreme Court has drawn a clear line a divorced Muslim woman cannot be stripped of what was given to her at marriage.
Gold, money, articles… if they were gifted to her, they must return to her hands.

In a strong reaffirmation of dignity and equality, the Court held that Section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 protects her right over every article that belongs to her, even after the marriage ends.

Link in Bio!

Supreme Court lays down 4-step process to determine veracity of quashment prayer raised by an accused under S. 482 CrPC
Reported by Sucheta Sarkar
Read More Here- https://scctimes.com/2414WAhVo

Download the SCC OnLine App
Android: https://lnkd.in/gDhaW2bs
iOS: https://lnkd.in/g5mS3zr4

**e

'Justice Hans Raj Khanna' stood alone in his dissent against Indira Gandhi. He maintained his view that no state has the power to deprive the person of his life and liberty without legal authority. He stated that:
"Article 21 cannot be considered to be the sole repository of the right to life and personal liberty of an individual. The right to life and liberty was not unknown at the time of constitution drafting; the principle that no one shall be deprived of his life and liberty without the authority of law was not a gift of the constitution. Thus, even in the absence of article 21, the state does not hold any power to deprive the citizens of their right to liberty. The power of the courts to issue a writ of habeas corpus is deemed to be one of the most important features of democratic states under the rule of law. The principle that no one shall be deprived of his life or liberty without the authority of law is derived from the notion that life and liberty are precious possessions of every individual".

My article on the need for a Privacy Act in India... published in Andhra prabha daily newspaper...7-8-2024 https://epaper.prabhanews.com/Telangana?eid=3&edate=07/08/2024&pgid=401892&device=mobile&view=0&sedId=0&uemail=

Fali s Nariman 10 tips....