Knowmad Institut

In global drug policy, the debate is no longer just about what works.

It is about how we know what we claim to know.

Our latest paper examines a growing tension in multilateral governance:
the gap between empirical limits and structural conclusions in high-visibility policy reports.

Not to dismiss critique.
But to ask a harder question:

👉 When does inference exceed its own evidential ground?

In complex systems, credibility is not only political.
It is methodological.

This paper explores why epistemic responsibility is not a constraint on advocacy, but a condition for its long-term legitimacy.

🔗 Read the full paper:
https://knowmadinstitut.org/journal/jms/article/view/111

knowmadinstitut.org

𝗖𝗡𝗗 𝟲𝟵 | 𝗦𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁: “𝗠𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗣𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗔𝗿𝗲: 𝗥𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗥𝗶𝘀𝗸 𝗪𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗲 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗥𝗲𝗰𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆”

As members of the Rome Consensus 2.0 𝗚𝗹𝗼𝗯𝗮𝗹 𝗔𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 we assisted to the Side event organized by the WORLD FEDERATION OF THERAPEUTIC COMMUNITIES INC : “𝗠𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗣𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗔𝗿𝗲: 𝗥𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗥𝗶𝘀𝗸 𝗪𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗲 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗥𝗲𝗰𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆”.

Congratulations to Mauro Patti , for his intervention as International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies - IFRC and Rome Consensus 2.0 , claiming that “𝟫.𝟤 𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘥𝘳𝘶𝘨 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘦”, demanding a humanitarian approach to face the health crisis of people with drug disorders.

Next to our partners in Rome Consensus 2.0 𝗚𝗹𝗼𝗯𝗮𝗹 𝗔𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲, as Knowmad Institut , we are committed to the promotion of Humanitarian Drug Policy, sustained in evidence-based research work.