Nadeem Saifullah Rafiq

This is so amazing, according to the Christian apologists their so called God Jesus revealed the Christian new testament bibles to Mathew, Mark, Luke and John and how they were preserved proves his divinity (Not)

And even more amazing is that in the 7th century Arabia, the Qur'an affirms a different Christian bible called the Injil in Arabic which was revealed to Prophet Jesus and you don't find any argument from the Christians in 7th century against what the Qur'an affirms.

The Qur'an 5:47 clearly affirms and commands the Christians living under Islamic rule in 7th century Arabia to judge by the laws revealed in the Bible (injil) a holy book Allah The Most High revealed to Prophet Jesus.

And then after the 7th century, the Bible (Injil) mentioned in the Qur'an disappears, which means that the only historical record we have for the Bible (Injil) which was revealed to Jesus is the Qur'an.

But there's another confusion which we must note, and that is that there are too many Christian bibles in history, some which are officially recognised by the Church which they call canon and others which they branded as Apocrypha and lost Apocrypha.

And because in Arabic they are all called Injil, so it would be incorrect to say that the Injil appeared and then disappeared.

Rather it's Christianity that cannot be trusted with true knowledge, because in some Christian sources it says that the Christians before the 15th century used to read Apocrypha bibles as well.

In history, there have been so many different Christian sects believing in different bibles that it makes it impossible to pin point how many different Christian bibles have existed in history.

The Christian apologists focus a lot on the Arabic word Injil and they try to make it out as though the Injil is a special name given to a book given to Prophet Jesus from God The Most High.

While it's not, all the Christian Bibles are called Injil in Arabic.

Now I want to ask you a logical question, you know there were a lot of Christian sects in history who followed different Bibles (Injils), so then why do you have an issue with believing that there were Christians living in 7th century Arabia who followed a different Bible (Injil) ?

Why do they stand out more to you than the rest ?

I think I know why, it's because you are finding it difficult to believe that how can there have been a Holy book revealed to Jesus, but we never heard of it and it never survived ?

I will tell you why, firstly as explained, there isn't a one specific book called the Injil in Arabic, because any Christian bible is called Injil in Arabic, so that's one of the main reasons we are not able to find it's mention in history.

And secondly it's because the Qur'an superceded the Torah and the Bible (injil), which means Allah The Most High has allowed (or caused) the Torah and the Bible (injil) to be forgotten (or distorted) after the Qur'an was revealed.

Think about it, why did Allah The Most High command the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah The Most High be upon him) to expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian peninsula ?

It's because after the Qur'an was revealed Allah The Most High only recognised Islam as the true religion, so if He The Most High had the Jews and Christians expelled from the Arabian peninsula, so it shouldn't come to us as a surprise if He The Most High allowed or caused the Torah and the Injil to be forgotten (or distorted)

I truly believe that the original Bible (injil) is in your Christian's Apocrypha bibles which you currently have, if it's not, then it's lost in history as an Apocrypha gospel.

And whichever Muslim says that there are fragments of the real Injil in the Christian new testament bibles are just assuming, because it says in the Christian sources that Mathew, Mark, Luke and John quoted verses from the old testament the Septuagint.

So how can those verses which you are assuming are fragments of the original Injil be the real Injil, if they are clearly copied from the Septuagint ?

From what we gather from reading the Qur'an, Allah The Most High did protect the Torah and the Injil until the Qur'an was revealed and also made the Torah and the Injil a witness for Prophet Muhammad's prophethood and the Qur'an.

And after the Qur'an was revealed, only the Qur'an was protected and preserved, not only in writing but also through oral memorization where thousands of Companions memorised it by heart.

Then it became hundreds of thousands of Muslims who memorised it by heart, then it became millions of Muslims who memorised it by heart world-wide, which means Allah The Most High has made it impossible for anyone to alter the Qur'an.

Just this evidence alone clearly proves that Allah The Most High is the true God who protected the Torah and the Injil.

And then after He The Most High revealed the Qur'an, He allowed the Torah and the Injil to be forgotten and only protected the Qur'an.

There's no other logical explanation for this based on the evidences that we have.

Now you Jews and Christians may ask that if Allah The Most High has allowed the original Torah and the Injil to be forgotten (or distorted) then how can you Jews and Christians who came afterwards be blamed for following a distorted scripture ?

Firstly for Allah The Most High allowing the Jewish and Christian scribes to distort the Torah and the Bible (Injil) means Allah The Most High caused these scriptures to be forgotten (or distorted) by not protecting them against distortions and it doesn't mean Allah The Most High distorted them.

It's the Jewish and Christian scribes that are guilty of distorting the words of Allah The Most High, and whoever believes in their distortions means they will also be blamed for believing in the falsehood which their scribes invented.

The Qur'an is a protected book, so Allah The Most High has made the Qur'an a witness against the distorted scriptures, so you will be blamed for leaving a protected book over the distorted one.

The Bible's Been Changed WAY More Than You Realize! Since the Books of the Bible were first written, just how much has the Bible been changed? After the New Testament was compiled, how much was it edited, twea...

Watch how Dr Zakir Naik dodges to explain one of the verses linked to the Islamic dilemma debate i.e. the Qur'an 5:68

And he takes the Christian professor around in circles in order to dodge the question and he says don't just read one verse.

Really, so why do you keep asking the Christians to produce one verse in which Jesus said he is God and worship him while ignoring all the verses which say Jesus has a human nature and a so called God nature ?

And he keeps telling the Christians that the Christian new testament bibles are distorted, but at the same time he says if Jesus has said in the Christian new testament bibles that he is God and worship him, then he is willing to accept Jesus as God and believe in the distorted Christian bibles.

See Dr Zakir Naik's hypocrisy, this is why he is one of the biggest currupters in Islam, he's a hypocrite who doesn't know he's a hypocrite because he is a blinded hypocrite.

He promotes showbiz television, oral s*xual in*******se, eating s*xual fluids, husband and wife ma********ng through video call, drinking camels urine, su***de attacks, and he promotes pe******ia by covering up for his Salafist Scholars who have unanimously agreed that it's allowed in Salafism to marry prebuescent girls (pe******ia)

Do you see the difference between our beliefs and the Salafist dawah cult beliefs ?

Also the Christian new testament bibles are not the Injil mentioned in the Qur'an, which means the Muslims are not allowed to give the Christian new testament bibles their own interpretation.

The Christian scholars have clearly said that according to their interpretation of the Christian new testament bibles, Jesus has a human nature and a so called God nature.

So unless you believe the Christian new testament is the Injil revealed to Mathew, Mark, Luke and John, otherwise you have no right to give the Christian new testament bibles your own interpretation.

He obviously only does this to attract attention in the media just like the rest of the Salafist dawah cult hypocrites.

But when the Christian apologists start giving their own interpretation to the Qur'an and Hadith and start picking out contradictions, then the Salafist dawah cult start crying Islamophobia, Islamophobia, missionary, missionary.

And they start lying against the Qur'an saying general confirmation, general confirmation.

May Allah The Most High curse the hypocrites who mix the truth with falsehood and lie against the Qur'an by believing in the Christian new testament bibles history.

Dr Zakir Naik is viewing this post, and we challenged him many times before to explain the meaning of the Qur'an 65:4 and the Qur'an 5:43-47

But he keeps hiding like the cursed satan's Salafist donkey that he is, he knows the Christian apologists have put the Salafist dawah cult in the Islamic dilemma and they keep going round and round in circles.

It's because they keep quoting the Christian new testament bibles in the media and they give the Christian new testament their own Salafist dawah cult interpretation, so now they don't know what to do, because anything they say creates contradictions and a dilemma.

If the Christian new testament bibles are not the Injil, then the Salafist dawah cult are stuck in the dilemma because they keep quoting from it by believing in it and giving it their own interpretation.

And if they say the Christian new testament bibles is the Injil then they are stuck again because that would mean the Qur'an is affirming a book which contradicts the Qur'an and it's written by anonymous authors (Mathew, Mark, Luke and John)

So they decided to fabricate a lie and said it's a general confirmation, which creates another dilemma because why would Allah The Most High confirm any books in general which He The Most High did not reveal to Mathew, Mark, Luke and John ?

Dr. Zakir Naik Gets DESTROYED In Debate With Christian Professor Is the Bible really corrupted or is that just a myth? This video dives into a calm but powerful Christian response to Dr. Zakir Naik’s claims. Backed by anci...