Rick Toor Law

"[122] The Applicant’s evidence is problematic. Her evidence was inconsistent with the evidence she provided in her trial with Mr. Pipitone and inconsistent with the information she provided for the annulment. Her story has changed, not just a handful of details, but the entire narrative. In her 12 year litigation with Mr. Pipitone she was very consistent in her allegations, pointing the finger of blame at Mr. Pipitone and not the Respondent. The Applicant now describes the Respondent as abusive and waters down the allegations she made against her second husband, Mr. Pipitone, now that the narrative does not suit."

Pipitone v. D’Amelio, 2018 ONSC 2970