Saving Ringo

Alberta Animal Rescue Crew Society say they care. Then why won't they check on Ringo after giving him away? They were informed Ringo (called Ritter by AARCS) was not looking right and I had a treatment that would work. I was promised they would look after Ringo and get an update and they lied about both. I asked them to give the new owners my info so if Ringo had problems but I doubt they did that either. They care more about how they look then about a special needs dog. AARCS has no accountability to anyone. I can only hope I am not the only person trying to make sure they have done the right thing for the animals they were trusted to re-home

This is the last message I sent to AARCS. Understand I don't want anything! I only wanted to give the new owners the medical info not in any of the vet's knots. It would take to long for me to type. If you talk to the vet Ringo saw at the care centre he could tell you some of the things I did. I asked to talk to the foster people to let them know some of Ringo's issues. The only reason I wished to pass on the info is so Ringo didn't suffer unnecessarily. If your organization cared about the animals you re-homed you would think making sure all medical info was passed on?