Snarky Gherkin

Staying overseas for a moment...

Over in the UK, the Bristol chapter of the “Enough is Enough” movement managed to turn out a dozen confused uncles and half a Telegram group chat… only to get outnumbered by police.

They were outnumbered by the people there to protect them.

Even the local pigeons weren’t bothered.

This is the British equivalent of “March for Australia” or “Put Australia First”... same sweaty flags, same recreational rage, same incoherence and same awkward silence when asked to name a single policy.

I once sat next to a bloke in a Bristol pub nicknamed Big Keith.
Keith had more crusty pork scratching crumbs under his fingernails than this lot had people in attendance.

Whilst it's not exactly Banksy-worthy or inspiring, if he did sketch something to represent the movement, it’d be a rat vomiting into a Greggs bag while reading a Daily Mail headline.

We’re calling this one a Fizzer.

Ahh... David White.

Back again with the digital equivalent of farting in a lift and blaming the WHO.

This time, he's screenshot a study title... just the title, plonked it into the comments like it's the smoking gun of the century, muttered something cryptic about "regrets with complying," and wandered off like he's just left his cardigan at the bus stop.

Let’s unpack this. Slowly. With small words.
Because once again, we’ve got a classic case of "technically true, contextually deceptive, wildly misleading". And I’m feeling generous as I'm 4 glasses of sav blanc in.

The study is titled “Long-term follow-up and outcomes of COVID-19 vaccine associated myocarditis in Victoria, Australia: A clinical surveillance study.”

It was run by Royal Children’s Hospital, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, University of Melbourne and SAEFVIC / VicSIS (Australia’s official vaccine safety surveillance programs)

What it actually found (the bit he didn’t screenshot) is that vaccine-associated myocarditis exists.
It mostly affects young males, usually after dose two, occurs at a low rate, and is overwhelmingly mild.

That’s not breaking news. That’s been in ATAGI guidelines since Home and Away still had decent writers.

The long-term outcomes are (you ready for this?) overwhelming number of patients fully recovered, symptoms resolved in weeks,
normal cardiac function returned, no excess deaths, no hidden ticking time bombs, literally the reason this paper exists was to answer "Is there long-term damage?"
Answer: Nope.

Not in this cohort. Not in the data. Not in the real world.

“LNPs leave the injection site”
Oh, Wh**ey. You were so close to understanding immunology.

Yes, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) leave the injection site. They are designed to. They travel to lymph nodes. That’s how your immune system goes, “Oi, what’s this?” and builds a response.

This has been known since before COVID.
If LNPs didn’t leave the site, you’d have about as much immunity as a cheese stick in the sun.

What the study doesn’t say or show...

No waves of long-term heart damage, no stealth epidemic of myocarditis, no justification for “regret with complying”, no broad vaccine harm narratives or anything about LNPs being dangerous...
It also doesn't say anything about mind control, 5G, graphene, or lizard royalty

In fact, this paper is often used by regulators to reassure patients and clinicians.

The only reason you’re hearing about it now is because someone like Wh**ey saw a scary word in the title and thought, “Oooooh, content".

The part they always leave out is that COVID infection itself causes myocarditis at a higher rate than the vaccine.
It hits older people, women, repeatedly, and with worse outcomes.

That’s not me editorialising... that’s what cardiology says.

But sure, David. Let’s pretend your screenshot is the smoking gun, and not the damp tissue it is.

This is why anti-vaxxers only ever posts the titles. Because the moment you look beneath it…
The narrative deflates faster than a Freedom Camp after Centrelink Tuesday.

You’d think being publicly humiliated for misunderstanding vaccine science hundreds of times would make a man pause. Maybe even shut up.

But no... RFK Jr. has graduated from podcast pseudoscience to a taxpayer-funded atrocity.

The U.S. Secretary of Health has greenlit a $1.6 million “study” in Guinea-Bissau... a country with one of the highest rates of hepatitis B infection on Earth, to test his pet theory that the Hep B birth dose causes neurological damage. You know, the same birth dose that’s saved millions of lives across three decades in the U.S. and is recommended globally.

So the plan is 14,000 babies divided into two groups... One gets the Hep B vaccine at birth (as they should). The other is intentionally denied that protection until six weeks old... even though that delay massively increases their risk of lifelong liver disease and cancer.

All so RFK can chase ghosts.
All so he can try to “prove” something the entire medical establishment disproved years ago.

And worst of all... he’s doing it in a developing country, where consent processes are murky, ethics boards are underfunded, and international outcry rarely arrives in time.

It’s the Tuskegee Experiment all over again.

Except this time, the lie isn’t "syphilis is harmless"... it’s "vaccines are the real threat."

And the outcome isn’t just academic... it leads to generational liver damage.

RFK is bypassing the standard scientific bidding process, handpicking anti-vax-friendly researchers, will rig the design to skew results and will do it all on the American dime, with taxpayer dollars funding a human rights disgrace.

Imagine a world where the U.S. government refused to test an unethical vaccine delay study on American babies... but thought it was fine for African ones. That world is now.

RFK isn’t just wrong. He’s dangerous. He’s exporting pseudoscience like it’s a colonial commodity.

And once again, the people paying the price are those with the least power to fight back.