OnPath Testing

Hot take: AI-generated code is like getting a recipe from someone who's never actually cooked the dish.

Sure, the ingredients list looks right. The steps seem logical. But somehow the salt measurement is "a handful" and the cooking time is "until it looks done."

We've been reviewing more AI-assisted code lately, and the patterns are fascinating. It's syntactically correct, follows conventions, but often misses the nuanced business logic that makes software actually work.

The future isn't AI replacing developers. It's developers getting really, really good at being AI editors.

Anyone else seeing this trend in their codebases?