Rim Diyaa ريم ضياء

Christian's, what happened to all of the zombie saints that were risen with Jesus pbuh? Did they live normal lives or go back in their graves after?

Mathew 27

Christians believe that G-d does human child sacrifice of His own son!

What blood thirsty god do they worship that needs the blood of his son? 😳 Allah can forgive us without that!

Human sacrifice is to'ebah. (the strongest word for something repulsive to God.)

If YHVH accepted human sacrifice, He would not have made its practice a capital offense punishable by death in His own law and in the Mosaic legal framework, human sacrifice was viewed as a "dark art" or "pagan superstition," not a valid form of religious devotion.

Under the Law of Moses, human sacrifice was a capital offense (punishable by stoning).

It was defined as an abomination (to'ebah) (the strongest word for something repulsive to God.)

If YHVH defines human sacrifice as to-ebah, then for Him to demand it would be a logical contradiction.

In the Torah (Deuteronomy 12:31), YHVH declares that human sacrifice is To'ebah—something He hates and finds repulsive.

If God used a To'ebah act to save humanity, He would be violating His own moral nature. It suggests a God who "broke His own law" to fix a problem He created.

Ezekiel 18:20: "The soul who sins is the one who will die... The righteousness of the righteous will be credited to them, and the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against them."

Deuteronomy 24:16: "Parents are not to be put to death for their children, nor children put to death for their parents; each will die for their own sin."

If YHVH’s own law forbids one person from being executed for the crimes of another, the concept of Jesus being "punished" for the sins of others is a direct violation of the Torah's definition of justice.

By framing Jesus as a "sacrifice," Christian theology inadvertently places YHVH in the same category as the pagan deities He spent the entire Old Testament condemning.

Hmm? 🤔:

If YHVH says child sacrifice is To'ebah, and the Christian God requires the sacrifice of His "Son," then either:

1. The Christian God is not YHVH.

2. Or, the Christian God committed a To'ebah act (human child sacrifice)

"If the Law of Moses (Deuteronomy 12:31) defines human sacrifice as To'ebah (an act that YHVH hates and never commanded) on what legal basis can a believer claim that the same God required the blood of a man to forgive sins?

To claim God accepted the death of Jesus as a 'sweet-smelling aroma' is to claim that God found pleasure in an act He previously termed an abomination.

The God of Adam, Enoch, and Moses is described as "Merciful and Gracious" (Exodus 34:6). He does not need to be "paid off" to forgive.

To suggest that YHVH (the creator of the universe) needed to kill Himself (or His son) to satisfy His own legal requirement is a pagan "Blood Debt" concept, not a Monotheistic one. It implies God is a slave to a "higher law" of blood that He cannot bypass without a killing.

If we accept the "Blood Atonement" theology, we are forced to admit that the "New Covenant" is actually a regression. It takes the To'ebah that Moses outlawed(the sacrifice of a human) and places it at the very center of the faith.

The Sanctity of Blood
The Torah establishes a fundamental "Law of Blood" that makes human sacrifice a theological impossibility.

Genesis 9:6: "Whoever sheds human blood, by humans shall their blood be shed; for in the image of God has God made mankind."

The Contradiction: Because humans are created B'tselem Elohim (in the Image of God), destroying a human life( even as an "offering") is an act of desecration against God, not a gift to Him.

In the later books of the Prophets, God expresses a sense of "divine horror" at the idea of human sacrifice, specifically citing that it never even entered His mind.

"They have built the high places of Baal to burn their children in the fire as offerings to Baal (something I did not command or mention, nor did it enter my mind" )

The Akedah: the test was to see if Abraham would obey, but the act itself was always outside the realm of what God truly desired.

The Akedah didn't just save Abraham's so ; it "saved" God from being perceived as the God who consumes His children. It taught that the way to serve the Creator is through a living commitment, not a human sacrifice.

Human sacrifice is to'ebah. (the strongest word for something repulsive to God.)

If YHVH accepted human sacrifice, He would not have made its practice a capital offense punishable by death in His own law and in the Mosaic legal framework, human sacrifice was viewed as a "dark art" or "pagan superstition," not a valid form of religious devotion.

Under the Law of Moses, human sacrifice was a capital offense (punishable by stoning).

It was defined as an abomination (to'ebah) (the strongest word for something repulsive to God.)

If YHVH defines human sacrifice as to-ebah, then for Him to demand it would be a logical contradiction.

In the Torah (Deuteronomy 12:31), YHVH declares that human sacrifice is To'ebah—something He hates and finds repulsive.

If God used a To'ebah act to save humanity, He would be violating His own moral nature. It suggests a God who "broke His own law" to fix a problem He created.

Ezekiel 18:20: "The soul who sins is the one who will die... The righteousness of the righteous will be credited to them, and the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against them."

Deuteronomy 24:16: "Parents are not to be put to death for their children, nor children put to death for their parents; each will die for their own sin."

If YHVH’s own law forbids one person from being executed for the crimes of another, the concept of Jesus being "punished" for the sins of others is a direct violation of the Torah's definition of justice.

By framing Jesus as a "sacrifice," Christian theology inadvertently places YHVH in the same category as the pagan deities He spent the entire Old Testament condemning.

Hmm? 🤔:

If YHVH says child sacrifice is To'ebah, and the Christian God requires the sacrifice of His "Son," then either:

1. The Christian God is not YHVH.

2. Or, the Christian God committed a To'ebah act.

"If the Law of Moses (Deuteronomy 12:31) defines human sacrifice as To'ebah (an act that YHVH hates and never commanded) on what legal basis can a believer claim that the same God required the blood of a man to forgive sins?

To claim God accepted the death of Jesus as a 'sweet-smelling aroma' is to claim that God found pleasure in an act He previously termed an abomination.

The God of Adam, Enoch, and Moses is described as "Merciful and Gracious" (Exodus 34:6). He does not need to be "paid off" to forgive.

To suggest that YHVH (the creator of the universe) needed to kill Himself (or His son) to satisfy His own legal requirement is a pagan "Blood Debt" concept, not a Monotheistic one. It implies God is a slave to a "higher law" of blood that He cannot bypass without a killing.

If we accept the "Blood Atonement" theology, we are forced to admit that the "New Covenant" is actually a regression. It takes the To'ebah that Moses outlawed—the sacrifice of a human—and places it at the very center of the faith.

The practices of Christianity are considered idolatrous to both Islam is Judaism so why is it acceptable to them?

🕍 In orthodox Judaism Incarnation is called: "Avodah Zarah" and it is rejected; God is incorporeal and One.

Blood sacrifice is called: "Korban" and it is rejected; human sacrifice is forbidden; repentance is personal.

Icons/ images is called: "Pesel" and it is forbidden; violates the Ten Commandments.

Abandoning Law is called: "Antinomianism" and it is rejected; the Torah and Mitzvot are eternal.

🕋 In Islam Incarnation is called: "Shirk / Kufr" and it is rejected. Allah is Al-Ahad (The One) and does not take human form or have children (Surah Al-Ikhlas).

Blood sacrifice is called: "Kaffarah" (Atonement) and it is rejected. Islam teaches no soul bears the burden of another. Forgiveness comes through sincere Tawbah (repentance) directly to Allah.

Icons/ images is called: "Taswir/ Sanam" and it is forbidden. Creating or venerating images of Divine figures or Prophets is prohibited to prevent idolatry and preserve the purity of worship.

Freedom from Law is called: "Naskh" and is rejected. Muslims believe Jesus(pbuh) came to confirm and slightly lighten the Mosaic Law, not to abolish the requirements of prayer, fasting, and dietary restrictions.

Christianity is basically a hybrid religion that only survived by absorbing and relabeling popular pagan customs to win over converts.

They worship saints and call it "venerating":

Patronage: In Roman paganism, you might pray to Neptune for a safe sea voyage or Ceres for a good harvest. In Catholicism and Orthodoxy, this transitioned into praying for the intercession of St. Nicholas (patron of sailors) or St. Isidore (patron of farmers).

Baptism: Ritual washing and initiation through water were common in the cults of Isis and Mithras as a way to "purify" the initiate and grant them entrance into a spiritual community.

The Sacred Meal: The concept of a communal meal where participants symbolically "commune" with a deity was present in various Greco-Roman traditions. In Mithraism, for example, followers partook in a ritual of bread and wine that served as a core act of worship.

The "Dying and Rising God"
In the 19th and early 20th centuries, "comparative mythologists" like James Frazer (author of The Golden Bough) argued that Jesus fit the archetype of the Dying and Rising God.
• The Archetype: Figures like Osiris (Egypt), Attis (Phrygia), and Adonis (Greece) were all mythological figures associated with death and rebirth, often tied to the seasonal cycles of vegetation.

Christmas was originally a festival for worshiping a false god who many consider Satan himself:

Christmas and Sol Invictus: The date of December 25th was not established as Jesus' birthday in the earliest centuries. It coincided with the Roman festival of Natalis Solis Invicti (Birth of the Unconquered Sun) and the winter solstice.

Easter was originally a pagan festival to worship the demon who's knows as Eostre (or Ostara).

The name "Easter" in English is derived from Eostre (or Ostara), a Germanic goddess of spring and fertility. The symbols of rabbits and eggs were ancient pagan emblems of rebirth and new life.

The self proclaimed prophet "Paul" and his letters do not suffice for me to break such serous commandments and to commit such sins...