StarNews.ls

When Nostalgia Becomes Amnesia: Lesotho’s Dangerous Rewriting of Its Past

There is nothing inherently wrong with political redemption. Former giants fall, fortunes falter, and parties search for relevance. Democracies allow that. What is far more troubling and profoundly dangerous is the quiet, deliberate rewriting of history now taking place in Lesotho, often dressed up as nostalgia, patriotism, or “setting the record straight.”

A troubling chorus has emerged in public discourse suggesting that Lesotho was once “in good hands” under authoritarian rule; that the absence of democracy was, in fact, a kind of paradise; that fear was stability; that repression was order. This is not reinterpretation. It is historical fraud.

History, unlike opinion, is not infinitely elastic. Lesotho’s past is not a rumour passed down at village firesides. It is recorded, archived, documented by journalists, scholars, churches, human rights organisations, and by the testimonies of those who lived through it. To suggest, now, that dictatorship was benign governance is to insult the record and mock the dead.

Was it paradise when opposition voices were silenced, abducted, and killed? When militias and rogue youth bands terrorised communities with impunity? When political disagreement was answered not with debate, but with intimidation and violence? Was it stability when families lived in perpetual fear, never knowing if their sons would return home, or whether a knock at the door would be the last sound they heard at night?

For many Basotho, those years were not an era of order, they were years of grief. Years of whispered conversations. Years when survival required silence.

And yet, today, beneficiaries of that system, often the children of the ruling elite, cushioned from the violence that sustained their privilege, speak with wistful fondness of their “good old days.” Their memories are not lies; they are incomplete.

They remember security because it was never denied to them. They remember opportunity because it was reserved for them. What they fail, or refuse, to acknowledge is that their comfort was purchased with the fear of others.

This selective memory is not innocent. It is political.

Rewriting the past serves a purpose: it launders moral responsibility. It converts victims into footnotes and perpetrators into misunderstood patriots. It allows failed political actors to rebrand themselves as saviours of a lost golden age, rather than as architects or beneficiaries of repression.

But the most devastating consequence is not reputational. It is generational.

A society that lies to its young about its past sabotages its future. When history is distorted, the new generation loses its moral compass. Democracy becomes negotiable. Human rights become optional.

Authoritarianism is normalised, not as a warning, but as an alternative. The result is confusion: about what went wrong, what must never be repeated, and what kind of country Lesotho should aspire to be.

Nations do not move forward by erasing their scars. They move forward by understanding how they were inflicted.

True reconciliation is impossible without truth. Political renewal is hollow without accountability. And nostalgia, when weaponised, becomes a form of national amnesia, one that sets the country back, not forward.

Lesotho’s future will not be secured by romanticising fear, or by mistaking silence for peace. It will be secured by honesty: by naming repression for what it was, acknowledging the pain it caused, and refusing to sell a counterfeit past to a generation that deserves better.

History is not a campaign slogan. It is a responsibility. And those who treat it lightly gamble not just with memory but with the very prospects of the nation.

It's better to look ahead and prepare than to look back and regret.
~ Jackie Joyner Kersee